The Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, simply put
The Act lists 12 ways a business can mislead customers or blur who it is, from copycat names to fake price cuts. Here is who it reaches, what a court can order and how it ties to the Consumer Fraud Act.
Prepared by Prem Tax and Accounting Corp. Last checked against official sources on October 29, 2026.
The Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, found at 815 ILCS 510, lists 12 ways a business can mislead customers or confuse them about who it is. A person likely to be damaged can ask a court to stop the conduct, and the Act names no state agency. Our check is the Sunday-Flyer Proof Binder. The official text is on the Illinois General Assembly website.
- Any person engaged in business, in a vocation or in an occupation is covered, at any size.
- Section 2(a) lists 12 practices, running from passing off through to false claims about price reductions.
- The Act's remedy is an injunction. It gives no damages and no civil penalty.
- The Consumer Fraud Act bars the same listed conduct as well, and it adds penalties.
What it forbids
| Theme | In plain words |
|---|---|
| Confusion | Passing off your goods or services as another business's, or creating likely confusion about source, sponsorship or affiliation. |
| Misstating goods or services | False origin; benefits or status they lack; used goods called new; a quality or model they lack. |
| Attacking a rival | False or misleading statements of fact that disparage another's goods or business. |
| Ad conduct | Ads with no intent to sell as advertised, or to meet expected demand unless a quantity limit is stated; false statements about price cuts. |
| Catch-all | Further conduct that creates likely confusion in a similar way. |
Illinois state law applies statewide. Not covered: conduct that complies with orders, rules or a statute of a federal, state or local agency, and publishers, broadcasters and printers who are unaware that a message is deceptive. Two further narrow carve-outs relate to the Act's start.
The numbers
| Item | Figure | Year or status |
|---|---|---|
| Remedy | Injunction; the plaintiff need not show money loss, lost profit or intent to deceive; attorney fees and costs only when the court finds the conduct willful | 2026 text |
| Civil penalty, or a limitation period | The Act states none | 2026 text |
Source: Section 2(a)
Our checklist
The Sunday-Flyer Proof Binder keeps proof behind every printed claim. These are good practices, not legal duties.
- Names: compare your name, logo and web address with nearby competitors.
- Claims: file the support for each "new", "original" or "certified" claim.
- Sale prices: keep dated records that each "was" price was real.
- Rivals: keep a source for each fact stated about a competitor.
Mistakes people make
- A "was and now" price where the "was" price was never charged.
- Calling used or refurbished goods new.
- Claiming a certification the business lacks.
Call an attorney when you receive a demand from a competitor to drop a name, logo or claim, or when a lawsuit seeks an injunction.
Common questions
Does the Act apply to a one-person business?
Yes. The Act has no size threshold.
Can someone win money damages under this Act?
Not under this Act's text, which offers an injunction, plus costs and fees for willful conduct. Money remedies come through other law, such as the Consumer Fraud Act.
Must a competitor prove customers were confused?
No. Under Section 2(b), a plaintiff does not have to prove competition or actual confusion.
Official sources
- Illinois General Assembly: Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS 510
- Illinois General Assembly: Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505
Keep reading
Let's talk about your taxes, your business, your plans.
Tell us what you need and we will get back to you quickly. There is no pressure: just a friendly conversation and a clear next step.
4260 Westbrook Dr, Suite 107
Aurora, IL 60504